The Soapbox

Stimp

Joined: 10/15/1998 Posts: 2179
Likes: 2004


Thanks, and a few questions regarding SC game theory


For the SC to take this case, wasn’t the decision largely (or completely, even) baked in the cake because of Texas?

Because of Texas, is it (one of) Roberts’ jobs to ensure the SC follow its own precedent and not seem dysfunctional? If so, and his vote ensures precedent is maintained, does that give cover to others to dissent if they so choose? IOW, are the SC hole cards revealed at once, or is there some vote massaging and horse trading going on ahead of the flip?

TIA

(In response to this post by WahooMatt05)

Posted: 06/29/2020 at 11:23AM



+0

Insert a Link

Enter the title of the link here:


Enter the full web address of the link here -- include the "http://" part:


Current Thread:
  Benedict Roberts. Pathetic. ** -- ryno hoo 06/29/2020 11:43AM
  So much winning ** -- Maupin233 06/29/2020 11:41AM
  More RWMF tears ** -- WaxHoo 06/29/2020 10:49AM
  Roberts for the win again ** -- wahoo138 06/29/2020 10:23AM

Notice: Trying to get property 'queue' of non-object in /data/www/sportswar.com/wp-includes/script-loader.php on line 2781

Warning: Invalid argument supplied for foreach() in /data/www/sportswar.com/wp-includes/script-loader.php on line 2781
vm307